Monday, September 24, 2012
Sunday, September 23, 2012
Trust
Monday, July 30, 2012
THE MAVEN - a poem written by my dad
THE MAVEN
(a poem that doesn’t ask the question: “Do mites have
ears?”)
by
Severt Score
Once upon a dead mite’s ear
was found a dozen dead bacteria,
Twelve microscopic corpses on
that arachnid on the floor.
As I spied that dead arachnid
I wondered what kind of whack did
Dispatch that tiny creature
to the land beyond death’s door.
What sent that little mite on
to the land beyond death’s door.
Tell me that, if nothing
more.
Was it some miniscule mugger
or a commercial de-bugger
That made that mite expire --
something he’d never done before?
Was it victim of a swatter?
Did it die from lack of water?
Did it starve for lack of
food because to buy it was too poor?
Was it victim of starvation
because to buy it was too poor?
What dispatched it through
death’s door?
Was it gout or was it dropsy?
Should we ask for an autopsy?
Should some wise forensic
wizard probe this mystery to the core?
Could some wise police
detective help us gain the right perspective
In the matter of the demise
of the mite upon the floor?
Could he find an explanation
of that body on the floor?
At least that, if nothing
more.
We went up to New Haven and
retained an able maven.
(“Maven” is a Yiddish word
for one who knows the score
And can go without confusion
straight to the right conclusion.)
He had been solving mysteries
for thirty years or more.
Expert in forensic medicine
thirty years or more.
Oh, that maven knew the
score!
Well, he came down to our
city to pursue the nitty gritty
Details of the mystery that
made our brains so sore.
He was persistent. He was
thorough. He carefully turned each furrow
As he plowed through all the
evidence -- o’er the facts did pore.
He left no stone unturned --
o’er all evidence did pore.
Oh, that maven knew the score!
Oh, whatever did that cop
see? Naught was found in the autopsy
But the dozen ear borne
corpses that we told about before.
All he found in the
inspection was a petered out infection --
Just a dozen dead bacteria --
only that, and nothing more.
Only twelve deceased bacteria
on the ear, and nothing more.
Just a dozen, three times
four.
Well, it seems that each
bacterium had succumbed to some strong serum,
But not before the arachnid
was a corpse upon the floor.
Given sooner that same serum
might have conquered each bacterium
In time to save their tiny
host and snatch it from death’s door.
Given sooner might have saved
it from passage through death’s door.
Now it’s dead upon the
floor.
Or perhaps some stronger sera
could have conquered the bacteria.
Some powerful medications
might have held some hope in store.
But saddest words of tongue or
pen, as the poet said, are “It might have been.”
And what might have been did
not occur, so it hit the floor.
For want of stronger sera the
arachnid hit the floor,
Stiffer than a two by four.
Can you tell us, clever
sleuth, relentless stalker of the truth,
If you find this kind of germ
when a mite’s ear you explore,
Does twelve seem an average
count, or what’s the usual amount?
When a mite’s ear you
explore, is it less or is it more?
Quoth the maven, “Never more.
Sometimes less, but never more.”
Quoth the maven, “Never
more.”
“To find none is always nice.
I’ve found a dozen once or twice.
“The usual number I have
found is in the range of three or four.
“Six or seven is not so
strange, but three or four’s the usual range.
“I have found twelve but
never more when a mite’s ear I explore.
“No arachnid has ever more
when its ear I explore.”
Quoth the maven, “Never
more.”
Thursday, June 7, 2012
Strength’s Casket
The ceiling hovers like an airtight lid.
The pounding in my head, nails,
I no longer resist.
I rest.
Rest is said to rejuvenate.
That’s what I’ll say I’m doing.
In this airless room,
I wait.
In the past, I had the strength
To run out the door to fields a flower,
To trudge toward the exit,
To crawl.
This state becomes the new norm.
I breathe smaller breaths,
Make fewer moves,
Eat less.
Oh, to fade from existence.
The crunching of the termite’s jaw
Muted, as from some distant land
Where destruction is merely change,
Deterioration is transformation.
I exhale.
Exhale.
Wednesday, February 15, 2012
I am Woman, Hear Me...
Coming off a project in which I wrote a script with three great, highly nuanced male roles and one so-so female supporting role, I read this article:
Nothing new. The study didn't even address the fact that there are more female actors vying for fewer good female roles.
I am proud of the latest script I completed, but I do regret that it had worse than a 3:1 ratio of decent male roles to female roles. Reading this article, I'm reminded that as a female writer, I still can be part of the gender inequality problem.
Since I started out acting, part of my dream has always been to write scripts that will bring creative opportunities and employment to more female actors. It is always about the story first, and not the casting agenda; however, with half of the world population being female, it is utterly foolish to think that strong female characters somehow weaken a story! The male-dominated story mill is not a product of logic, but rather of habit. Given the fact that male screenwriters are less likely to go out of their way to create strong female roles*, I believe it is not only a noble dream for me to do what I can to fill the gap... it is also my responsibility.
It was such a joy to see all of those women up at the podium receiving the SAG Award for outstanding cast for The Help this year. While I must admit that it would be nice to someday receive recognition from the Academy for my writing, I think it would be equally enjoyable to be able to sit back and watch a group of talented actresses receive an award that they never would have been considered for if not for hours, weeks, months, even years I spent creating characters for them to inhabit.
This is not just another "I am woman, hear me roar" rant, but rather a "I am woman, hear me... Hey! Over here! I am woman, I exist... I am part of this world you are writing about. Please remember that at least occasionally. It could even add some authenticity and depth to your writing!"
There may have been a lot of changes in the world for women in the four decades since Helen Reddy wrote her #1Hit Song, "I am Woman," but looking at what comes out of (and what goes on in) Hollywood, I'd say we've still got a long way to go... Baby.
* Hats off to Tate Taylor, however, for writing the screenplay for The Help (based on a novel by a female writer, BTW)
Gender inequality still has a starring role in Hollywood
Nothing new. The study didn't even address the fact that there are more female actors vying for fewer good female roles.
I am proud of the latest script I completed, but I do regret that it had worse than a 3:1 ratio of decent male roles to female roles. Reading this article, I'm reminded that as a female writer, I still can be part of the gender inequality problem.
Since I started out acting, part of my dream has always been to write scripts that will bring creative opportunities and employment to more female actors. It is always about the story first, and not the casting agenda; however, with half of the world population being female, it is utterly foolish to think that strong female characters somehow weaken a story! The male-dominated story mill is not a product of logic, but rather of habit. Given the fact that male screenwriters are less likely to go out of their way to create strong female roles*, I believe it is not only a noble dream for me to do what I can to fill the gap... it is also my responsibility.
It was such a joy to see all of those women up at the podium receiving the SAG Award for outstanding cast for The Help this year. While I must admit that it would be nice to someday receive recognition from the Academy for my writing, I think it would be equally enjoyable to be able to sit back and watch a group of talented actresses receive an award that they never would have been considered for if not for hours, weeks, months, even years I spent creating characters for them to inhabit.
This is not just another "I am woman, hear me roar" rant, but rather a "I am woman, hear me... Hey! Over here! I am woman, I exist... I am part of this world you are writing about. Please remember that at least occasionally. It could even add some authenticity and depth to your writing!"
There may have been a lot of changes in the world for women in the four decades since Helen Reddy wrote her #1Hit Song, "I am Woman," but looking at what comes out of (and what goes on in) Hollywood, I'd say we've still got a long way to go... Baby.
* Hats off to Tate Taylor, however, for writing the screenplay for The Help (based on a novel by a female writer, BTW)
Labels:
actors,
Emily Joy Craig,
female,
gender inequality,
Gib Gerard,
Helen Reddy,
Hollywood,
I am Woman,
Jenn Gotzon,
male-dominated,
roles,
SAG Awards,
screenwriting,
story,
The Help,
Writing
Friday, January 27, 2012
ON THE OPINION OF A WRITER
So, the viewing marathon is over and my ballot has been cast.
I'm looking forward to seeing which performances my peers will select as the best of the year in the 18th Annual Screen Actors Guild Awards. I've been eligible to vote all 18 years. That's a lot of years of keeping my dues current even when I've not been acting, but I keep it up because I never officially quit acting -- I've just been on a very prolonged maternity leave.
For those who don't know my story, like so many other starry-eyed young girls, I came to Hollywood intending to act. My road to stardom, however, quickly became very bumpy. Literally. Bumpy. Within weeks of arriving, I contracted my first of five consecutive major bumps.
Concealing an ever-growing "Baby Bump" while running to call-backs for roles like one recurring character who was supposed to be a skinny model was one thing, but after the colicky child arrived making it to any audition, rehearsal, or performance became next to impossible. It had all happened too quickly. Without extended family or resources to pay for babysitters, I could not go on auditions, and without going on auditions one can not get cast, and thus, can not act. I'm not complaining. That derailment ended up bringing me back to an earlier love -- writing. That was something I could do at home and I didn't need to hire babysitters nearly as often.
Over the past 18 years, I've come to look at movies from a much more writerly perspective. While I love a great performance, it is usually the story that that I find myself analyzing and celebrating most when it is well done. (And I would argue that actors rarely win "Best Actor" awards alone, but rather in partnership with well-written scripts.) Because of this, I have to really slow myself down when faced with the question of which film to choose for the "Outstanding Performance by a Cast" award. I have to remind myself that this award is not about the story, it's about the acting. This is such a collaborative art that the dissection is not always as easy as it might seem.
Watching all of these great performances does give me the itch to get back into that form of creative expression again, but I may have to wait a bit longer to do that. I'm still overseeing the education of three of my kids, and dedicating a lot of time to writing. I want to be Superwoman and juggle it all at once, but the truth is, I'm not. For now, I'm a writer and mom (or perhaps I should say "mom and writer" -- priorities always affect perspective.) Acting and painting (and traveling the world, not to mention keeping a clean house) will have to remain on hold.
All that said, I view my SAG screeners as an actor, and I view them as a writer. And I celebrate when both sides are pleased. Although, I would say this was far from the best year I have seen for performances paired with stories that blow me away, there were several celebration-worthy nominees. The Help easily won my vote for "Outstanding Performance by a Cast" and is (not surprisingly) also a "Best Picture" Academy Award nominee.
Personally, I found The Artist delightful, and yet I heard one Hollywood outsider say, "Oh brother! Not another film about making films! How self-indulgent can these filmmakers be?" It's a worthy (and fiscally necessary) challenge to strive for objectivity and to try to see films as those who are not in the industry might see them.
Then there are all those films about characters who happen to be writers -- sometimes they work and sometimes they do seem self-indulgent. Is the writer only being lazy and writing about what he or she does in order to avoid research? I do find myself wondering what non-writers think of these movies.
Whether a person is in a "creative profession" or not, however, we all do create -- we create the lives we live and the environments we inhabit; some create fantasy worlds so elaborately detailed that they even deceive themselves; we create relationships and networks of relationships (and sometimes we destroy them); we create harmony and disharmony.... Because creativity is at the core of what all people do in the living of life, I think stories about writers and artists, if done well, can embody that creativity (which is rather abstract) in a metaphor that resonates well beyond the surface of the storyline of a certain character and his profession.
Woody Allen's Midnight in Paris was one of this year's films that did that well. The competition did not allow for me to cast my vote for it to get a SAG award, but I am glad to see that it received some Oscar nominations. It is a good story that I wouldn't mind watching again... and the writer in me absolutely loved this little exchange:
I'm looking forward to seeing which performances my peers will select as the best of the year in the 18th Annual Screen Actors Guild Awards. I've been eligible to vote all 18 years. That's a lot of years of keeping my dues current even when I've not been acting, but I keep it up because I never officially quit acting -- I've just been on a very prolonged maternity leave.
For those who don't know my story, like so many other starry-eyed young girls, I came to Hollywood intending to act. My road to stardom, however, quickly became very bumpy. Literally. Bumpy. Within weeks of arriving, I contracted my first of five consecutive major bumps.
Concealing an ever-growing "Baby Bump" while running to call-backs for roles like one recurring character who was supposed to be a skinny model was one thing, but after the colicky child arrived making it to any audition, rehearsal, or performance became next to impossible. It had all happened too quickly. Without extended family or resources to pay for babysitters, I could not go on auditions, and without going on auditions one can not get cast, and thus, can not act. I'm not complaining. That derailment ended up bringing me back to an earlier love -- writing. That was something I could do at home and I didn't need to hire babysitters nearly as often.
Over the past 18 years, I've come to look at movies from a much more writerly perspective. While I love a great performance, it is usually the story that that I find myself analyzing and celebrating most when it is well done. (And I would argue that actors rarely win "Best Actor" awards alone, but rather in partnership with well-written scripts.) Because of this, I have to really slow myself down when faced with the question of which film to choose for the "Outstanding Performance by a Cast" award. I have to remind myself that this award is not about the story, it's about the acting. This is such a collaborative art that the dissection is not always as easy as it might seem.
Watching all of these great performances does give me the itch to get back into that form of creative expression again, but I may have to wait a bit longer to do that. I'm still overseeing the education of three of my kids, and dedicating a lot of time to writing. I want to be Superwoman and juggle it all at once, but the truth is, I'm not. For now, I'm a writer and mom (or perhaps I should say "mom and writer" -- priorities always affect perspective.) Acting and painting (and traveling the world, not to mention keeping a clean house) will have to remain on hold.
All that said, I view my SAG screeners as an actor, and I view them as a writer. And I celebrate when both sides are pleased. Although, I would say this was far from the best year I have seen for performances paired with stories that blow me away, there were several celebration-worthy nominees. The Help easily won my vote for "Outstanding Performance by a Cast" and is (not surprisingly) also a "Best Picture" Academy Award nominee.
Personally, I found The Artist delightful, and yet I heard one Hollywood outsider say, "Oh brother! Not another film about making films! How self-indulgent can these filmmakers be?" It's a worthy (and fiscally necessary) challenge to strive for objectivity and to try to see films as those who are not in the industry might see them.
Then there are all those films about characters who happen to be writers -- sometimes they work and sometimes they do seem self-indulgent. Is the writer only being lazy and writing about what he or she does in order to avoid research? I do find myself wondering what non-writers think of these movies.
Whether a person is in a "creative profession" or not, however, we all do create -- we create the lives we live and the environments we inhabit; some create fantasy worlds so elaborately detailed that they even deceive themselves; we create relationships and networks of relationships (and sometimes we destroy them); we create harmony and disharmony.... Because creativity is at the core of what all people do in the living of life, I think stories about writers and artists, if done well, can embody that creativity (which is rather abstract) in a metaphor that resonates well beyond the surface of the storyline of a certain character and his profession.
Woody Allen's Midnight in Paris was one of this year's films that did that well. The competition did not allow for me to cast my vote for it to get a SAG award, but I am glad to see that it received some Oscar nominations. It is a good story that I wouldn't mind watching again... and the writer in me absolutely loved this little exchange:
GIL: Would you read it? ERNEST HEMINGWAY: Your novel? GIL: Yeah, it's like 400 pages long and I'm just looking
just for, you know, just an opinion. ERNEST HEMINGWAY: My opinion is I hate it. GIL: I mean, you haven't even read it. ERNEST HEMINGWAY: If it's bad I'll hate it because I hate
bad writing. If it’s good, I'll be envious and hate it
all the more. You don't want the opinion of another
writer.
(from Woody Allen’s Midnight in Paris, 2011)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)